If you are building an automated test scripts and want to get started in knowing how to integrate your test suite in CI/CD process then this is a beginner guide for you. Here I am going to illustrate…
Why Architecture Is Important
All architectures have one common goal — to manage the complexity of your application. You may not need to worry about it on a smaller project, but it becomes a lifesaver on larger ones.
How does Clean Architecture approach the problem?
First we’ll see what it looks like:
Additional benefits of using an architecture when structuring app code include:
Five design principles make software design more understandable, flexible and maintainable. Those principles are:
Cone view of Clean Architecture-
Clean Architecture maximizes the use of these principles.
MVVM separates your view (i.e. Activity
s and Fragment
s) from your business logic. MVVM is enough for small projects, but when your codebase becomes huge, your ViewModel
s start bloating. Separating responsibilities becomes hard.
MVVM with Clean Architecture is pretty good in such cases. It goes one step further in separating the responsibilities of your code base. It clearly abstracts the logic of the actions that can be performed in your app.
Our data flow diagram:
The code is divided into three separate layers:
We’ll get into more detail about each layer below. For now, our resulting package structure looks like this:
Even within the Android app architecture we’re using, there are many ways to structure your file/folder hierarchy. I like to group project files based on features. I find it neat and concise. You are free to choose whatever project structure suits you.
This includes our Activity
s, Fragment
s, and ViewModel
s. An Activity
should be as dumb as possible. Never put your business logic in Activity
s.
An Activity
will talk to a ViewModel
and a ViewModel
will talk to the domain layer to perform actions. A ViewModel
never talks to the data layer directly.
Here we are passing a UseCaseHandler
and two UseCase
s to our ViewModel
. We’ll get into that in more detail soon, but in this architecture, a UseCase
is an action that defines how a ViewModel
interacts with the data layer.
The domain layer contains all the use cases of your application. In this example, we have UseCase
, an abstract class. All our UseCase
s will extend this class.
And UseCaseHandler
handles execution of a UseCase
. We should never block the UI when we fetch data from the database or our remote server. This is the place where we decide to execute our UseCase
on a background thread and receive the response on the main thread.
As its name implies, the GetPosts
UseCase
is responsible for getting all posts of a user.
The purpose of the UseCase
s is to be a mediator between your ViewModel
s and Repository
s.
Let’s say in the future you decide to add an “edit post” feature. All you have to do is add a new EditPost
UseCase
and all its code will be completely separate and decoupled from other UseCase
s. We’ve all seen it many times: New features are introduced and they inadvertently break something in preexisting code. Creating a separate UseCase
helps immensely in avoiding that.
Of course, you can’t eliminate that possibility 100 percent, but you sure can minimize it. This is what separates Clean Architecture from other patterns: The code is so decoupled that you can treat every layer as a black box.
This has all the repositories which the domain layer can use. This layer exposes a data source API to outside classes:
PostDataRepository
implements PostDataSource
. It decides whether we fetch data from a local database or a remote server.
The code is mostly self-explanatory. This class has two variables, localDataSource
and remoteDataSource
. Their type is PostDataSource
, so we don’t care how they are actually implemented under the hood.
In my personal experience, this architecture has proved to be invaluable. In one of my apps, I started with Firebase on the back end which is great for quickly building your app. I knew eventually I’d have to shift to my own server.
When I did, all I had to do was change the implementation in RemoteDataSource
. I didn’t have to touch any other class even after such a huge change. That is the advantage of decoupled code. Changing any given class shouldn’t affect other parts of your code.
Some of the extra classes we have are:
UseCaseThreadPoolScheduler
is responsible for executing tasks asynchronously using ThreadPoolExecuter
.
This is our ViewModelFactory
. You have to create this to pass arguments in your ViewModel
constructor.
I’ll explain dependency injection with an example. If you look at our PostDataRepository
class, it has two dependencies, LocalDataSource
and RemoteDataSource
. We use the Injection
class to provide these dependencies to the PostDataRepository
class.
Injecting dependency has two main advantages. One is that you get to control the instantiation of objects from a central place instead of spreading it across the whole codebase. Another is that this will help us write unit tests for PostDataRepository
because now we can just pass mocked versions of LocalDataSource
and RemoteDataSource
to the PostDataRepository
constructor instead of actual values.
Note: I prefer using Dagger 2 for dependency injection in complex projects. But with its extremely steep learning curve, it’s beyond the scope of this article. So if you’re interested in going deeper, I highly recommend Hari Vignesh Jayapalan’s introduction to Dagger 2.
See you in the next tutorial, but for the time being I bid adieu :)
I have pondered the Pali terms Piti and Sukha lately. They are the first two constituents of the First Jhana. The Jhanas are states of peace and/or of absorption encountered in Buddhist meditation…
There has always been a huge amount of excitement around topics like Artificial Intelligence(AI). When someone mentions AI, you either think about AIs like Siri and how our lives have changed over…
Tacuma Ogunseye recently surrendered to the police in Guyana. He is being accused of violating section 2 (3) of the Racial Hostility Act. I have expressed in prior articles that I did not agree with…